"This bot made 500% last month!"
Cool. Show me the next month.
The trading bot industry is full of promises. Passive income. Set and forget. Let the algorithm do the work.
Most of it is garbage. Let me explain why—and what actually works.
There are basically four types of trading bot strategies:
Place buy orders below current price, sell orders above. Profit from oscillation.
Pros: Works in ranging markets. Simple to understand. Cons: Gets destroyed in trends. Loses money when price moves one direction.
Dollar-cost average into positions. Buy regularly regardless of price.
Pros: Reduces timing risk. Good for accumulation. Cons: Not really "trading." Just automated buying.
Execute trades based on technical indicators. RSI, MACD, moving averages.
Pros: Can capture trends. Systematic approach. Cons: Indicators lag. Most signal strategies underperform.
Execute based on complex, multi-factor conditions. Price + pattern + volume + timing.
Pros: Can replicate sophisticated trading logic. Flexible. Cons: Requires good strategy design. Garbage in, garbage out.
This last category is what dashpull does. And it's the only one I trust.
Bot sellers show you backtests. Amazing returns. Perfect equity curves.
What they don't tell you: the strategy was optimized to fit historical data. It found patterns that existed in the past but won't repeat.
This is called curve fitting. It's the #1 reason bots fail in live trading.
A bot optimized for 2021's bull market will fail in 2022's bear market.
Markets change. Volatility changes. Correlations change. A static bot can't adapt.
Backtests assume perfect execution. Reality is messier.
Slippage. Fees. Latency. Liquidity issues. These eat into returns.
A strategy showing 50% annual returns in backtest might show 20% in reality. Or negative.
Most bot strategies have no actual edge. They're just systematized randomness.
"Buy when RSI < 30" isn't an edge. It's a rule that sometimes works and sometimes doesn't.
An edge requires understanding WHY something works. Not just THAT it worked historically.
After years of testing bots, here's what I've found:
The more parameters, the more curve fitting risk.
A strategy with 3 conditions is more robust than one with 15 conditions.
Simple strategies might have lower backtested returns, but they actually work in live trading.
"RSI < 30" is a weak signal.
"RSI < 30 + price at major support + bullish engulfing + volume spike" is a strong signal.
The combination of conditions filters out noise. Each condition alone is weak. Together, they're powerful.
The best entry signal in the world is worthless without risk management.
Position sizing. Stop losses. Maximum drawdown limits. These determine long-term success more than entry signals.
Fully autonomous bots are dangerous. Markets change. Bots don't adapt.
The best approach: human judgment for strategy design, automated execution for consistency.
Here's how I approach trading automation.
What's the hypothesis? Why should this work?
"Price tends to bounce at support levels, especially on the second touch with confirmation."
That's a hypothesis I can test and understand.
Turn the hypothesis into specific, measurable conditions.
No ambiguity. Either conditions are met or they're not.
Before thinking about entries, define:
Set up the conditions in dashpull. Let the system watch and execute.
But review regularly. Are the trades working? Do conditions need adjustment?
No strategy works forever. Markets change.
Review performance monthly. Adjust conditions if needed. Retire strategies that stop working.
Conditions:
This captures bounces at key levels. Simple, effective.
Conditions:
This enters trends on pullbacks. Better entries than breakouts.
Conditions:
This fades overcrowded positions. Works well in crypto.
All three are set up in dashpull. They run continuously. I review weekly.
How to spot a scam bot:
"500% monthly returns!"
If it sounds too good to be true, it is. Sustainable returns are 20-50% annually, not monthly.
They show profits but hide losses. Every strategy has drawdowns. If they're not showing them, they're hiding something.
"Our proprietary algorithm..."
If they won't explain how it works, don't trust it. You should understand what you're running.
"Limited spots available! Sign up now!"
Good strategies don't need high-pressure sales. Scams do.
Backtests are not track records. Live, verified performance is.
Ask for Myfxbook, 3Commas, or exchange-verified results. Not screenshots.
Trading bots can work. But most don't.
The ones that work:
dashpull is my tool for this. I define the conditions. The system executes. I maintain oversight.
It's not "set and forget." It's "set, monitor, and adjust."
That's the reality of trading automation. Anyone telling you otherwise is selling something.
Ready to build real trading automation? Try dashpull →
Fibonacci Trading Strategy: The Math That Markets Actually Respect
Fibonacci levels seem like magic. They're not. But they work. Here's how to use them without falling into the mysticism trap.
Automated Trading Strategies: How to Actually Make Automation Work
Automation sounds perfect. Set it up, let it run, collect profits. Here's the reality of what it takes to make automated trading actually work.