"The golden ratio is everywhere in nature!"
Yeah, yeah. Sunflowers. Seashells. The Parthenon.
But does it work in trading?
After 10 years of using Fibonacci levels, my answer is: yes, but not for the reasons people think.
Fibonacci retracements are everywhere in trading. The 38.2%, 50%, 61.8% levels. Traders swear by them.
But why would a 13th-century math sequence predict where Bitcoin will bounce?
Here's my theory: it doesn't matter if Fibonacci is "real." It matters that enough traders believe in it.
When thousands of traders are watching the 61.8% retracement, they place orders there. Those orders create support or resistance. The level becomes significant because people expect it to be significant.
Self-fulfilling prophecy. And I'm okay with that.
Quick primer for those unfamiliar.
You draw Fibonacci from a swing low to a swing high (for an uptrend) or high to low (for a downtrend).
The tool plots horizontal lines at key ratios:
These represent potential retracement levels. Where price might pull back to before continuing.
Not all Fibonacci levels are equal. Here's what I focus on:
This is the big one. The "golden ratio." The level most traders watch.
In strong trends, pullbacks often find support at 61.8%. It's deep enough to shake out weak hands but not so deep that it breaks the trend.
Not technically a Fibonacci number, but included in most tools.
50% is psychologically significant. "Price retraced half the move." Traders remember this level.
In very strong trends, price might only retrace to 38.2% before continuing.
If price bounces at 38.2%, the trend is strong. If it blows through, expect deeper retracement.
If price retraces to 78.6%, the trend is weak. One more push and it's broken.
I'm cautious at 78.6%. The risk/reward isn't great because the trend might be over.
Here's how I actually use Fibonacci.
Fibonacci works best in trending markets. In a range, the levels are less meaningful.
I need a clear impulse move—a strong swing from low to high (or high to low).
From the swing low to swing high for uptrends. High to low for downtrends.
I use the most recent significant swing. Not some random high from 6 months ago.
I don't predict which level will hold. I wait for price to get there and show me.
Price at 38.2%? Watch for a bounce. Price at 50%? Watch for a bounce. Price at 61.8%? Watch for a bounce.
This is crucial. Fibonacci alone is not enough.
I need confirmation:
Fibonacci + confirmation = trade. Fibonacci alone = wait.
I set this up in dashpull. Price at Fibonacci level + confirmation pattern = execute entry.
Retracements are for entries. Extensions are for targets.
After a retracement, where might price go?
Common extension levels:
I use 161.8% as my primary target. It's the most commonly respected extension.
Fibonacci levels are powerful. Fibonacci levels that align with other factors are more powerful.
Confluence examples:
When Fibonacci aligns with another technical factor, the level is stronger.
I specifically look for these confluences. They're my highest probability trades.
Fibonacci should be drawn from significant swing points. Not random candles.
A swing low is a low with higher lows on both sides. A swing high is a high with lower highs on both sides.
If you're drawing from noise, you'll get noise.
Fibonacci levels are zones, not lines.
Price might bounce at 60.5% or 62.3%. Close enough. Don't demand perfection.
"Price is at 61.8%! Buy!"
No. Wait for confirmation. The level might not hold. Let price show you.
Fibonacci works in trends. In a range, the levels are arbitrary.
If there's no clear impulse move, don't force Fibonacci onto the chart.
I've seen charts with 10 different Fibonacci drawings. Levels everywhere. Analysis paralysis.
Use one Fibonacci at a time. The most recent significant swing. That's it.
Fibonacci works on all timeframes. But higher timeframe levels are more significant.
A 61.8% retracement on the daily chart is more important than on the 15-minute chart.
My approach:
Here's how I use dashpull for Fibonacci trading.
Entry conditions:
Exit conditions:
I manually identify the Fibonacci levels (this requires judgment). Then I automate the entry conditions.
Let me be honest.
Fibonacci isn't magic. It's not some universal law of markets. It's a tool that works because enough people use it.
But that's okay. Trading is about finding edges. If Fibonacci levels create predictable behavior, that's an edge.
The key is using Fibonacci correctly:
dashpull helps me execute Fibonacci trades systematically. Levels identified. Conditions defined. Execution automated.
The golden ratio might be mystical. My trading isn't.
Ready to trade Fibonacci levels? Try dashpull →
VWAP Trading Strategy: The Institutional Tool Retail Traders Ignore
VWAP is how institutions trade. Here's how to use it to your advantage instead of getting run over by it.
Trading Bot Strategies: What Actually Works (And What's Just Marketing)
Everyone's selling trading bots. Most of them don't work. Here's how to separate the real strategies from the scams.