I've been automating trades for 5 years.
The first 2 years? Mostly losses. Broken bots. Strategies that worked in backtests and failed live.
The last 3 years? Consistent profits. Not spectacular. But consistent.
What changed? My understanding of what automation actually is—and isn't.
Let me be clear about what trading automation does:
It executes your strategy consistently.
That's it. That's the whole thing.
Automation doesn't:
It does:
The edge has to come from you. Automation just executes it.
There's a spectrum of trading automation:
The system watches conditions and alerts you. You decide whether to trade.
Lowest automation. Highest human involvement.
The system watches conditions and executes predefined orders when conditions are met.
This is what dashpull does. Medium automation. Human defines strategy, system executes.
The system makes all decisions. Entry, exit, position sizing, everything.
Highest automation. Highest risk if something goes wrong.
I operate mostly at Level 2. Human judgment for strategy. Automated execution for consistency.
"But I want fully passive income!"
I get it. The dream is appealing. But here's why full automation usually fails:
A strategy optimized for trending markets fails in ranging markets. A strategy for low volatility fails in high volatility.
Full algos can't adapt. They keep doing what they were programmed to do, even when it stops working.
Every edge decays over time. As more people discover a pattern, it gets arbitraged away.
Full algos don't know when their edge has decayed. They keep trading a dead strategy.
Flash crashes. Exchange outages. Unprecedented news events.
Full algos aren't programmed for these. They either freeze or do something catastrophically wrong.
Code has bugs. APIs fail. Connections drop.
Without human oversight, a bug can drain your account before you notice.
Here's my framework for successful automation:
You can't automate what doesn't exist.
Before any automation, you need a strategy that works. Tested manually. Proven profitable.
Automation amplifies your strategy. If your strategy is bad, automation makes it worse faster.
Vague strategies can't be automated.
"Buy when it looks like support" → Can't automate. "Buy when price is within 1% of the 20-day low and a bullish engulfing forms" → Can automate.
Every condition must be specific and measurable.
Don't jump to full algo. Start with conditional orders.
Define your entry conditions. Let dashpull watch and execute. You handle everything else.
This gives you automation benefits with human oversight.
Automation is not "set and forget."
Review performance weekly. Are trades executing as expected? Is the strategy still working?
Adjust conditions when needed. Pause automation when market conditions change.
Start with small positions. Verify everything works. Then scale.
I've seen people go all-in on a new automated strategy. It fails. They lose everything.
Start small. Prove it works. Then increase size.
Here's my actual setup:
I have 3-4 strategies running at any time:
Each strategy has specific conditions defined.
dashpull handles execution. Conditions are set. When they're met, orders execute.
Entry orders, stop losses, and take profits are all predefined.
I check daily:
Weekly, I review:
Monthly, I evaluate:
This is not passive. It's active management of automated systems.
"Maybe automation will make it work!"
No. Automation executes your strategy consistently. If your strategy loses, automation loses consistently.
Fix the strategy first. Then automate.
What if something goes wrong? What if the market crashes? What if there's a bug?
You need a kill switch. A way to stop everything immediately.
I have maximum daily loss limits. If hit, all automation stops. No exceptions.
"I'll just tweak these parameters to improve the backtest..."
Stop. You're curve fitting. The more you optimize, the worse live performance will be.
Simple, robust strategies beat optimized, fragile strategies.
"It's automated, so I don't need to check it."
Wrong. Markets change. Strategies decay. Bugs happen.
Check your automation regularly. Daily at minimum.
"I'll run 20 strategies for diversification!"
You can't monitor 20 strategies effectively. When something goes wrong, you won't catch it.
Start with 2-3 strategies. Master those. Then maybe add more.
Let me set realistic expectations:
Automated trading will:
Automated trading won't:
The traders who succeed with automation are the ones who:
Automated trading works. But not the way most people imagine.
It's not passive income. It's not set and forget. It's not a replacement for skill.
It's a tool that executes your strategy consistently, removing emotional interference and capturing opportunities around the clock.
dashpull is my automation tool. Conditional orders that execute my predefined strategies. Human oversight for the big picture. Automated execution for the details.
That's the balance that works. That's the automation that actually makes money.
Ready to automate your trading the right way? Try dashpull →
Trading Bot Strategies: What Actually Works (And What's Just Marketing)
Everyone's selling trading bots. Most of them don't work. Here's how to separate the real strategies from the scams.
Backtesting Trading Strategies: How to Test Without Fooling Yourself
Backtesting is essential. It's also dangerous. Here's how to test strategies without falling into the curve-fitting trap.