"Quant trading is for PhDs at hedge funds."
I believed this for years. Quant trading meant Renaissance Technologies. Citadel. Two Sigma. Guys with physics degrees building algorithms I couldn't even understand.
Then I realized something.
The core principles of quant trading? They're accessible to anyone. You don't need a PhD. You don't need to code in C++. You just need to think systematically.
Let me demystify this.
Quant trading is simply: making trading decisions based on data and rules, not gut feelings.
That's it. That's the whole thing.
When you say "I'll buy when RSI is below 30 and price is at support," you're doing quant trading. You've defined quantifiable conditions for entry.
When you say "I feel like this is going up," you're not doing quant trading. You're gambling with extra steps.
Here's something the hedge fund guys don't want you to know:
Retail traders have advantages that institutions don't.
A hedge fund managing billions can't trade small-cap altcoins. The liquidity isn't there. They'd move the market just by entering.
You? You can trade anything. Your $10,000 position doesn't move markets.
Institutions have rules. They can only trade certain assets, certain strategies, certain risk profiles.
You can do whatever works. No compliance department. No investment committee.
A hedge fund takes months to approve a new strategy. Committees, backtests, risk reviews.
You can adapt in days. Market changed? Adjust your approach. No bureaucracy.
Alright, let's get practical. Here's how to think like a quant.
Every quant strategy starts with a hypothesis. A belief about how markets work.
Examples:
Your hypothesis doesn't need to be complex. Simple hypotheses often work best.
Turn your hypothesis into specific, measurable conditions.
"Price at support" becomes:
"Strong momentum" becomes:
No ambiguity. No "I feel like." Just conditions that are either true or false.
When do you enter? When do you exit?
Entry: All conditions are true Exit: Stop loss at X, take profit at Y, or conditions reverse
Again, specific. Measurable. No discretion in the moment.
This is where dashpull comes in.
You've defined your conditions. Now set them up as conditional orders. The system watches for your conditions and executes when they're met.
No emotional interference. No hesitation. Pure systematic execution.
Let me walk you through a real example.
Hypothesis: Price tends to bounce at significant support levels, especially on the second touch.
Conditions:
Entry: Long on candle close when all conditions are met
Exit:
Position size: Risk 1% of account per trade
That's a complete quant strategy. Simple, specific, executable.
I set this up in dashpull and let it run. The system watches for the conditions. I don't need to stare at charts.
"But did you backtest it?"
Yes. And here's the truth about backtesting:
Backtesting is useful but dangerous.
Useful because it shows if your logic makes sense historically.
Dangerous because it's easy to fool yourself. Overfit to past data. Find patterns that don't repeat.
My approach:
Don't trust a backtest that shows 500% returns. That's almost certainly overfit.
Here's my confession:
I'm not a pure quant. I use discretionary judgment for some things.
What I quantify:
What I keep discretionary:
This hybrid approach gives me the best of both worlds. Human judgment for the big picture. Systematic execution for the details.
More conditions = fewer trades = less statistical significance.
If your strategy requires 10 conditions to align, you might get 2 trades per year. That's not enough data to know if it works.
Keep it simple. 3-5 conditions maximum.
"I'll just add one more filter to remove those losing trades..."
Stop. You're fitting to past data. Those "losing trades" you're filtering out? They'll happen again in the future.
A robust strategy has losing trades. That's normal. Don't optimize them away.
Your backtest shows 0.5% profit per trade. Great!
But you're paying 0.1% in fees. And 0.1% in slippage. And 0.1% in spread.
Your actual profit? 0.2%. Maybe less.
Always factor in realistic costs.
The best entry signal in the world is worthless without risk management.
Position sizing. Stop losses. Maximum drawdown limits. These aren't optional.
Let me share my actual quant stack:
For analysis:
For execution:
For review:
You don't need fancy tools. You need systematic thinking.
If you want to try quant trading, here's my advice:
Quant trading isn't magic. It's not a secret formula that prints money.
It's simply systematic thinking applied to trading. Define your conditions. Execute consistently. Measure results. Improve.
You don't need a PhD. You don't need to work at a hedge fund. You just need to think clearly and execute disciplined.
dashpull is my tool for the execution part. I define the conditions. The system executes. No emotions. No hesitation.
That's quant trading for retail. And it works.
Ready to trade systematically? Try dashpull →
Is Algo Trading Profitable? The Honest Answer After 5 Years of Automation
Everyone asks if algo trading is profitable. The real answer is complicated. Here's the truth from someone who's built and broken dozens of systems.
Trading Indicators: The Brutal Truth About RSI, MACD, and Everything Else
Most traders use indicators wrong. Here's what indicators actually tell you, what they don't, and how to use them without getting destroyed.